CiNZ

The value of telling it like it was. The best honours project ever?

This article from Australian Journal of Chemistry uses the example of textbook treatments of the ‘Rutherford nucleus’ to illustrate the need to avoid conflating important concepts, the value in testing one’s understanding, and the importance of not ignoring seemingly inexplicable infrequent results.

Christopher Barnett, Thomas Maschmeyer, Anthony F. Masters, Alexander K. L. Yuen

The views and opinions expressed in Chemistry inNew Zealand are those of the individual authors and are not necessarily those of the publisher, the Editorial Board or the New Zealand Institute of Chemistry.
Whilst the publisher has taken every precaution to ensure the total accuracy of material contained in Chemistry in New Zealand, no responsibility for errors or omissions will be accepted.

All material published is licensed under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, see more

models

The value of telling it like it was. The best honours project ever?

Subscribe to the CINZ newsletter